Showing posts with label Oil Crash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil Crash. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Oil Bear to Eat $28 Oil This Spring?

While Ghawar Guzzler has been cocksure about America's abundant natural gas situation, it's been somewhat less forth-coming about oil's price and supply - though its been adamant that low prices and good supply should continue for some time. The recent run-up in price over $50 (no biggie; we thought $80 per barrel last fall was cheap - remember?) seemed to be caused more by the shitty dollar, as opposed to "supply and demand" fundamentals; especially in the face of declining demand, ongoing gluts (think ocean tankers and Cushings, OK), and no sign of normal appetite for at least the rest of the year.

One great dame, Stephanie Aymes, is growling like a bear. She sees $28 a barrel by the second-quarter, and possibly $16 or lower after that. Time will tell if she's correct (she's forecasting $71 a barrel next month), but I thought I'd post this anyway (link):

Crude oil is set to drop to $28 a barrel in New York in the second quarter, according to technical analysis by Societe Generale SA.

Prices may rally until meeting resistance at $71 a barrel and then plunge to their lowest since 2003, Societe Generale analyst Stephanie Aymes said, using charts that make use of Elliott Wave theory.

“The market can continue to bounce, but in the next month the bear-trend will resume,” Aymes said in a telephone interview from London yesterday. Her prediction that oil will fall to $28 was made in the Paris-based bank’s technical analysis for commodities in the second quarter.

Aymes’s analysis using the Elliott Wave indicates that prices will rise, a rally bound by the $71 a barrel level last traded in November, and then drop to $33.20, a support shown by a trend-line of low points reached in the past 10 years. A drop below $33.20 opens the way for a further decline to a range between $28 and $25, her charts show. After that, support comes at $16.50 and $10 a barrel.


- Brewskie

Monday, February 23, 2009

Has High Priced Oil Been Sent Through the Meat Grinder?

Great to be back! This should be a better week:)

The peak oil prophets saw the light once and are convinced that high-priced oil will return again - very soon, with vengeance. There will likely be some rise at some point, and when the world economy recovers, there's no doubt it will put some bite into demand. But $100+ barrel oil? This may take some time, and while the Chicken Littles wait, they will laughably be ostracized by mainstream society for (as they have for decades) crying wolf too many times over too many decades. Cut your bamboo rods, you!

Seeking Alpha had an interesting post indicating that, as opposed to what some market analysts and the so called peak oil "experts" have to say, this may take a while. Oil appears be a deflated athlete: it's artificial high price was pumped up like a Mark McGwire parade float on load-boats of steroid helium and HGH; and like the dot com bust, it may not be coming back, as this pinnacle float blew a leak wider than George W.'s empty skull, and flew off to space to never come back.

The article can be found here, and below are some bits:

Remember when Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Dell (DELL), Lucent (ALU), Yahoo (YHOO) and Cisco (CSCO) ruled the markets? There was an era, roughly 1997 to 2000 when those stocks actually mattered...

[...]

And then, they just didn’t matter anymore. Once the dot com bubble burst, every bounce or rally in these names was basically a selling opportunity…for 8 years and counting! See the above chart for a notion of how frustrating it must have been to stay positive on NASDAQ tech names.

[...]

I believe that this story is repeating itself in the oil patch. Market participants seem to be in a state of disbelief that Chesapeake (CHK), Transocean (RIG), National Oilwell Varco (NOV) and ConocoPhillips (COP) aren’t important anymore. These stocks may have have seen the best levels they will ever see, at least for a long time.

[...]
When the credit crunch hit the hedge funds, we saw a raft of speculative money come out of commodities across the board. Then, industrial demand for oil literally disappeared from North America to China. These two events revealed to many newbies what the old school oil traders already knew, that commodities (and the related stocks) could be more volatile than what many were prepared for.

[...]

The oil names, in contrast, are trading at absurdly low multiples, in fact, the average PE ratio on the 18 oil stocks that make up the Oil Services ETF is only 5.08! This low multiple reflects the fact that last year’s earnings were peak earnings in this very cyclical business. Next year’s “E” is a giant unknown, but the market knows it ain’t going to stack up to when crude was over $100.

And so now, we will watch for years as these stocks grind it out in between the recent lows and the highs of yesteryear. In the meantime, investors on both Wall Street and Main Street will gradually come to the realization that the Chesapeake position they put on at 70 will not be break-even any time soon (if ever). In frustration, the hot money that came in but was too slow to sell closer to the top will come out, which makes all short-term rallies suspect in the entire sector.

And according to Joshua Brown, the old sow himself - T. Boone Pickens - may be placed out to the "pasture for slaughter" before oil hits $300 a barrel.

On a side-note, Ghawar Guzzler has been examining last year's oil production charts, and there's reason to be delighted: a giant oil glut appeared to be occurring right under our panicked $140 a barrel eyes; and the shocking part is - it could have been bigger. This news is in the works and plans are in place to post it this week. Happy days!

- Brewskie